What was the first online dating site in history?

Genuine question about first online dating site in history from someone still working it out. Where I keep getting stuck is the hit rate.

The honest tradeoff with first online is how fiddly it is against convenience.

Any firsthand experience with first online dating site in history would help.

Seconding Beverly on this. my experience with first online shifted completely once I paid attention to how it feels to use.

I'd put whether it leads anywhere above almost everything else when it comes to first online.

The part people underrate about first online is how it handles day to day. Nobody warns you that first online depends so heavily on how real the profiles are.

My experience with first online shifted completely once I paid attention to the practical side. Hope that gives you something usable for first online dating site in history.

I keep seeing bad advice about first online dating site in history, so here is the version that held up. In practice, first online lives or dies on how alive the pool is.

If the learning curve isn't sorted, first online will not go anywhere. Most of the frustration with first online traces back to the bot problem.

The rules I settled on for first online:

• reply inside a day or the thread goes cold at least where first online is concerned
• fill the profile out properly, not half way if first online is the goal
• rewrite your opener if nothing lands in a week while you are testing first online
• hold your number back until you have actually met on the first online side

Anyway, that's my read on first online dating site in history.

If you want a comparison point on first online, have a look at Turndate.

I still keep an account on Rendate purely for first online.

I have to push back on Beverly a bit here. i would put the setup above almost everything else when it comes to first online.

Nobody warns you that first online depends so heavily on how much of it is real. Once I stopped worrying about the profile quality, first online got a lot simpler.

Concretely, for first online:

• keep the first message to two or three lines when it comes to first online
• rewrite your opener if nothing lands in a week on the first online side
• run one platform properly instead of five badly specifically for first online
• budget a solid month before deciding anything about first online

The part people underrate about first online is the hit rate. If how quickly you get going is not sorted, first online will not go anywhere.

I judge first online almost entirely on the hit rate now.

What decided it for me with first online was the signal-to-noise ratio.

Happy to expand on any part of first online dating site in history if it helps.

Building on what Simone said, the honest tradeoff with first online is how it feels to use against convenience.

I'd put the fake-account issue above almost everything else when it comes to first online. Two people can have opposite results with first online purely because of the profile quality. Nobody warns you that first online depends so heavily on the conversion from match to conversation.

Does first online still hold up for you lot? If you try first online dating site in history, give it longer than you think you need.

Naomi put it better than I would have. the part people underrate about first online is the profile quality. I'd put the interface side above almost everything else when it comes to first online. Most of the frustration with first online traces back to how often it goes somewhere.

If the actual outcomes isn't sorted, first online will not go anywhere. Two people can have opposite results with first online purely because of the learning curve. That is roughly where I landed on first online dating site in history.

If you want a comparison point on first online, datenest.site.

Been asked about first online dating site in history enough times that I may as well write it out. The honest tradeoff with first online is how fiddly it's against convenience.

I judge first online almost entirely on the setup now. In practice, first online lives or dies on what people get out of it. Take that as one data point on first online dating site in history, not gospel.

If you're asking about first online dating site in history, you're already ahead of where I was. The part people underrate about first online is the learning curve.

I would put the conversion from match to conversation above almost everything else when it comes to first online. In practice, first online lives or dies on the actual outcomes.

I judge first online almost entirely on how real the profiles are now.

Seconding Brittany on this. the part people underrate about first online is the actual outcomes.

In practice, first online lives or dies on whether it actually works. Most of the frustration with first online traces back to whether the users are genuine. Worth testing first online dating site in history yourself for a week before deciding.

If you want a comparison point on first online, Datewander.

I spent a while on first online dating site in history and ended up somewhere unexpected. Most of the frustration with first online traces back to the hit rate. Once I stopped worrying about the everyday experience, first online got a lot simpler.

My experience with first online shifted completely once I paid attention to whether it leads anywhere.

In practice, first online lives or dies on whether the users are genuine. That is the short version of first online dating site in history; ask if you want detail.